attribution models
Experiment Readout Clinic
Structure experiment memos that survive legal and product review—power, guardrails, and language that resists overclaiming.
Description
For teams running frequent tests. We stress ethics of peeking, pre-registration discipline, and visuals that do not imply causality you did not earn.
What is included
- Pre-register mini template suited to fast cycles
- Confidence statement cheat sheet
- Chart swaps that reduce misread
- Localization notes for bilingual teams
- Rollback communication script
- Stakeholder FAQ for inconclusive results
- Archive naming so past tests stay findable
Outcomes
- Publish two clinic-reviewed readouts
- Standardize a go/no-go checklist
- Reduce hedging paragraphs by structuring limits upfront
Cohort FAQ
Do you teach frequentist vs. Bayesian?
We compare at a decision-making level, not a math exam level. Bring your statistician for deep dives.
Templates legally binding?
No—templates are educational; counsel reviews policies for your firm.
What if experiments rarely launch?
You can bring historical tests—we rehearse readouts on retrospectives. Expect homework-heavy weeks anyway.
Experience notes
“The inconclusive-results FAQ saved a Friday leadership sync. People stopped asking the dashboard to imply certainty it never had.”
“Wish we had carved time for Bayesian stop rules—acknowledged as advanced add-on. Still worth it for memo structure alone.”